Jaraa'idJaraa'id
Notification Show More
Latest News
Max Verstappen reveals he was ‘physically limited’ at Saudi Arabian Grand Prix – ‘Felt like I was missing a lung’
Sports
Trump and advisers caught off guard by New York indictment
United States
Lessons from Australia: UK’s migration law set to repeat mistakes
Africa
Jailed Malaysian ex-PM Najib loses bid for review of graft conviction
Asia
Trump criminally charged in New York, a first for a US ex-president
United States
Aa
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Africa
  • United States
  • Europe
  • Asia
  • Sports
  • Videos
  • Live Score
  • More
    • Business
    • Market Data
      • Stocks
      • Commodities
      • Cryptocurrency
      • Forex
    • Weather
Reading: US court looks set to revive challenge to school district’s gender identity policy
Share
Aa
Jaraa'idJaraa'id
  • Somalia
  • Africa
  • United States
  • Europe
  • Asia
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Videos
Search
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Videos
  • World
    • Africa
    • United States
    • Europe
    • Asia
  • Market Data
    • Stocks
    • Commodities
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Forex
  • More
    • Sports
    • Business
    • Weather
    • Live Score
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Jaraa'id > United States > US court looks set to revive challenge to school district’s gender identity policy
United States

US court looks set to revive challenge to school district’s gender identity policy

News Room
Last updated: 2023/03/10 at 3:27 PM
News Room Published March 10, 2023
Share
SHARE

March 9 (Reuters) – A panel of conservative U.S. appeals court judges on Thursday appeared poised to revive a lawsuit challenging a Maryland school district’s policy of not disclosing students’ transgender identity to their parents.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel during a hearing in Richmond, Virginia, appeared to agree with a group of parents in Montgomery County, Maryland, whose lawsuit challenging the 2020 policy was brought before the panel after a judge dismissed it last year. The parents argued it allows school officials to usurp their roles in their children’s upbringing.

“This is a major life decision that should involve the parents,” Circuit Judge Paul Niemeyer said as the panel heard arguments in the case before it makes a decision.

The policy directs school personnel to help transgender students create a plan to transition, including using preferred pronouns, names and bathrooms, and bars staff from informing parents of those plans without a student’s consent.

The federal judge in Maryland who dismissed the case last August said the parents do not have a fundamental right to be promptly informed of their child’s gender identity.

The parents are represented by the National Legal Foundation, a Christian conservative group that has been involved in a series of other cases involving LGBTQ rights, abortion and prayer in schools.

Steven Fitschen, the group’s president, said in an email that he anticipates filing more lawsuits challenging school policies barring the disclosure of students’ gender identity.

At least 168 U.S. school districts with more than 3.2 million students have such policies, according to conservative group Parents Defending Education.

Thursday’s case is the first of its kind to reach a U.S. appeals court. Parents have filed lawsuits challenging similar policies adopted by school districts in Massachusetts, Wisconsin, Virginia and Iowa, among other states. Some of those have been dismissed and others are pending.

The 4th Circuit is not currently considering the merits of Montgomery County’s policy, but whether the parents can sue over it and have identified a constitutional right that was allegedly violated.

Niemeyer, an appointee of Republican former President George H.W. Bush, and Circuit Judge Marvin Quattlebaum both said the policy had injured parents, giving them grounds to sue, by inviting students to secretly transition.

Quattlebaum and Circuit Judge Allison Rushing, who rounded out the panel, are appointees of Republican former President Donald Trump.

The county board of education in adopting the policy said it was necessary “to embrace the vibrant diversity of our community and ensure that all students feel welcomed, safe, and respected.”

Alan Schoenfeld, a lawyer for the board, argued on Thursday that the policy was valid because it created a “student-led” process rather than allowing school officials to impose their will on students.

“There is no allegation that the school is making any decision or directing the process,” he said. “The child is deciding.”

Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Deepa Babington

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Daniel Wiessner

Thomson Reuters

Dan Wiessner (@danwiessner) reports on labor and employment and immigration law, including litigation and policy making. He can be reached at daniel.wiessner@thomsonreuters.com.

Read the full article here

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
News Room March 10, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular News
Sports

Max Verstappen reveals he was ‘physically limited’ at Saudi Arabian Grand Prix – ‘Felt like I was missing a lung’

News Room News Room March 31, 2023
Trump and advisers caught off guard by New York indictment
Lessons from Australia: UK’s migration law set to repeat mistakes
Jailed Malaysian ex-PM Najib loses bid for review of graft conviction
Trump criminally charged in New York, a first for a US ex-president
Law versus man: Trump’s courtroom drama begins
Mark Selby withstands Ryan Day charge to set up clash with Shaun Murphy in semi-finals of Tour Championship
Trump can still run for president in 2024 after being indicted
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

You Might also Like

United States

Trump and advisers caught off guard by New York indictment

March 31, 2023
United States

Trump criminally charged in New York, a first for a US ex-president

March 31, 2023
United States

Trump can still run for president in 2024 after being indicted

March 31, 2023
United States

Republican rivals, leaders rally around Donald Trump after indictment

March 31, 2023
  • Somalia
  • Africa
  • United States
  • Europe
  • Asia
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Forex
  • Stock Market

About US

Jaraa'id is your one-stop website for the latest global and local news and updates, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.
Quick Link
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press ReleaseSubmit
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Top Sections
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Videos
  • Market DataLive
  • Weather

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our Latest articles instantly!

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions

2023 © Jaraa'id. All Rights Reserved.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?